Post by account_disabled on Jan 2, 2024 2:06:21 GMT -5
Aprinciple of speed. Also the Court held that no constitutional provision prohibits the law from establishing a prior administrative procedure without a jurisdictional character such as for example the graceful or hierarchical administrative appeal procedure and the right of free access to justice does not it is an absolute right it can be subject to certain conditions. . Moreover the Court ruled that the provisions contained in Title IX of Government Ordinance no. regarding the Fiscal Procedure Code republished in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of.
July regulates administrative appeal procedures Country Email List whereby the bodies that issued the challenged administrative acts or their superior bodies have the possibility to revert to the measures taken. Such procedures in which the resolution of complaints and appeals is assigned to the body that issued the challenged act or to its superior hierarchical body do not meet the defining elements of jurisdictional activity characterized by the resolution by an independent and impartial body of disputes regarding the existence extent or the exercise of subjective rights they being specific to the administrative function see in this regard Decision no. of October published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of January . . Since no new elements have intervened likely to determine the reconsideration of the jurisprudence of the.
Constitutional Court both the solution and the considerations contained in the mentioned decisions retain their validity in the present case being applicable mutatis mutandis both in terms of the constitutionality of the provisions of art. para. as well as those of art. para. from Government Ordinance no. . . Regarding the claim that the criticized provisions are unconstitutional and by reference to Law no. regarding the Fiscal Procedure Code published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of July.
July regulates administrative appeal procedures Country Email List whereby the bodies that issued the challenged administrative acts or their superior bodies have the possibility to revert to the measures taken. Such procedures in which the resolution of complaints and appeals is assigned to the body that issued the challenged act or to its superior hierarchical body do not meet the defining elements of jurisdictional activity characterized by the resolution by an independent and impartial body of disputes regarding the existence extent or the exercise of subjective rights they being specific to the administrative function see in this regard Decision no. of October published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of January . . Since no new elements have intervened likely to determine the reconsideration of the jurisprudence of the.
Constitutional Court both the solution and the considerations contained in the mentioned decisions retain their validity in the present case being applicable mutatis mutandis both in terms of the constitutionality of the provisions of art. para. as well as those of art. para. from Government Ordinance no. . . Regarding the claim that the criticized provisions are unconstitutional and by reference to Law no. regarding the Fiscal Procedure Code published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of July.